https://pad.nixnet.services/s/1vISAH77n https://knowhow.brainbot.com/s/0uS1ISPfz https://docs.snowdrift.coop/s/09qvA9NQ1 https://hedgedoc.studentiunimi.it/s/t0ymwuIhQ https://doc.projectsegfau.lt/s/LQSjCHxV9T https://hackmd.chuoss.co.jp/s/SJ84aAeRWl https://hackmd.diverse-team.fr/s/SkuF6CgR-x https://hdoc.romainmahieu.fr/s/71_oUeAICZ August 13, 2014 at 10:50 am @ BuenaVista: Let me be Captain Obvious here, and say that your Mrs. Smith is the prototype model, the quintessential example, of the kind of woman EMK is talking about. She is representative of EMK’s clientele: mid to late 30s. Has her own job and her own money. Never married or divorced, no kids (might or might not want kids). Moderate to liberal in political views. Well informed, or at least better informed than the average idiocrat. Prefers MSNBC and CNBC to Fox News and Nancy Grace (but probably also watches So You Think You Can Dance). Intelligent, capable, self-sufficient monetarily. Does not conform to traditional sexual morality. Has a sexual past – the man she’s currently seeing is definitely not her first rodeo partner. What always strikes me about your descriptions is how similar the sexual interplay is to women of all ranges of experience and socioeconomic status. The only real difference is the type and station of “provisioning” and leadership expected. The provisions might cost you a little more, and the tug on the reins might be a little more subtle and nuanced, but provisioning and leadership is still expected. So EMK’s 38 year old “high value” woman is, in the end, just a woman – she wants to be loved, protected and led. The man’s task is to somehow extract her “value” as quickly and inexpensively as possible. 48 jf12 says: